“ …[W]hile we must accept blogging into the historical archives, we must also realize that we may have lost another unique form of communication and historical information — personal correspondence. Why “may have”? Well, people wrote those letters under the impression that they were personal and private. And then, after they died, the letters were made public, put into collections, sold for profit, and displayed for all the public to see. What makes you think that something similar will not happen with people’s email? ”
Can The Girl Effect work? I really don’t think it can, and I’m a fairly optimistic person when it comes to these causes. (Side note: I found this on Global Giving, a wonderful site that you should explore.)
“ I think a big part of the reason old-school Letterman is so hard to find these days is that talk shows are ephemeral by design. Hosts begin with a monologue referencing current events and celebrity happenings that are quickly lost to the ages, then interview stars of the moment plugging projects that, more often than not, will quickly be forgotten. Is the world really hungering to see, say, Bobcat Goldthwait (whom I happen to think is enormously talented) plug Hot To Trot on The Tonight Show 20 years after the fact? Or Donna Mills jabber on insipidly about whatever the hell it is Donna Mills was once mildly famous for? ”
from a recent edition of Ask The AV Club. I think the answer to that question is: no, the whole world is not hungering to see some has-been from 20 years ago talk about a new project on Letterman. But, someone in the world is. As my friend Kevin Donovan would say, there is a limitless amount of digital storage space and because the long tail exists, it can be productive and profitable.
I know I’d enjoy seeing clips of George Carlin in the early 1980s, of Barenaked Ladies’s first Letterman performance, and of the first joke about the Monica Lewinsky scandal.
I just finished a 65-hour work week. I am exhausted, stressed out, and I miss spending time with my friends and family.
It really gives me an appreciation for the folks who work 65-, 75-, even 100-hour weeks to feed their families. I really don’t know how they keep going with the amount of help they get (or, more accurately, don’t get).
“ The [No Child Left Behind] accountability system, as practiced at urban schools like Douglass, tends to operate like a merry-go-round; principal turnover rates in Baltimore are very high. School leaders get on board, ride until they get dizzy and stumble off, and then new leaders come aboard. ”
from Sarah Reckhow’s guest column in The Eduwonkette. Teach For America had her stationed at Douglass, a struggling school in Baltimore. Her column makes the argument that the focus needs to be on what schools are doing right (certain after-school programs) rather than on what they are doing wrong (poor retention of already generally low-quality teachers).
I think it would be wise to focus on recruitment and training of new teachers: if they want kids to stay after school, they are going to need an assertive, high-quality teacher that serves as a role model and instigator of change in students’ lives. The heartwarming front-page-gracing success stories may come from unique after-school programs, but the vast majority of the real grunt work happens in classrooms with dedicated, qualified, and influential teachers.
I just clicked on an advertisement in my Facebook NewsFeed (for the new The Hold Steady album) and it opened iTunes. Not only is that obnoxious, but it also frightens me to think of what else they and others could open via unmarked links without my consent.
I am consistently amazed with Facebook’s inability to squash bad ideas like this in their meetings and planning sessions. People bash Google for things I usually don’t even consider “being evil,” but nobody even holds Facebook to that high “don’t be evil” standard.
I, for one, could potentially use Facebook (and Google) for my entire life. With such a lock on me and millions of other people, these companies should make it their business to think not only about their five-year plans, but about what they can do to ensure we’re there in five years.
Is a car’s decal more for the car company or the car owner?
Similarly, is the “Abercrombie” text on one’s shirt more for the seller or buyer? The LV on a handbag? The Bose on a speaker?
Another thought on customers and the seller-buyer relationship: I think one major indicator of a company’s future success and appeal is whether or not there is a demand for t-shirts with their logo on them. Chipotle sells tons of t-shirts. So does The Salty Dog Cafe.